Following a notable legal reversal, the Australian classification review board has reversed a prior decision that blocked viewers in Australia from accessing video footage of the violent event involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. The appeal was initiated by Elon Musk's company X, which contested an directive sought by the national eSafety commissioner.
Following the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the eSafety commissioner petitioned the classification board to assess and rate the available footage. The board initially ruled the content was "refused classification", a rating that empowered the commissioner to order platforms to geo-block the videos for users in Australia.
The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on a separate video—showing the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been classified as "unacceptable for distribution".
In its appeal, X contended that the Kirk video contained only a short moment of violence with the weapon not shown. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the focus shifted rapidly from the victim to the surrounding crowd.
X argued the video was not overly graphic, exploitative, or objectionable, adding that it served as a factual documentation of "a significant incident of public importance that generated widespread discussion". X drew a parallel between the footage and the well-known recording of the JFK shooting.
Most members of the review board concluded that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary could have met that threshold. As a result, the board changed the classification of the videos to R18+.
Some on the board disagreed, arguing the post was "a shareable video for the likely purposes of amusement and/or benefit (such as likes, shares, or views)". This view stated the comparison to the Zapruder JFK film was flawed, as the Kennedy video was made public long after the event, "after public sentiment regarding it had calmed".
Posting on its official policy channel, the platform expressed approval of the decision.
"X fought this case to defend free speech and the importance of public access about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains committed to safeguarding these fundamental values."
A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner acknowledged the ruling, but pointed out that the revised classification now implies platforms "must take steps to prevent R18+ material is not accessible to Australians who are minors".
In related news, the regulator has not issued take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident circulating on social media. The regulator stated that while the content were upsetting, they did not reach the high threshold for a "total ban" rating.
As an alternative, platforms have been advised to use sensitive content labels and interstitials, such as blurring, on such content in accordance with their own content policies.
A seasoned business strategist with over a decade of experience in digital marketing and corporate growth initiatives.
James Shepherd
James Shepherd
James Shepherd
James Shepherd
James Shepherd